church relevance

CONNECT   SUBSCRIBE  

KentShaffer.com AcreScout LifeChurch.tv Center for Church Communication Compassion Bloggers

When Clover launched their church website company in May 2008, I appreciated their immediate sponsorship of Church Relevance. But more than that, I was intrigued by their premade church websites that did not look like premade websites. They were clean and beautiful.

Now 14 months later, I am simply impressed.

I see more and more church websites sporting a “Made by Clover” icon. Their content management system is outstandingly simple yet powerful. And Clover has become an active supporter of many of my favorite church blogs, conferences, and magazines.

THE PROS

  • Very Low Cost
    Every Clover website costs a one-time fee of $1,000 plus $20 per month for hosting and support.
  • Quick Turnaround
    Rather than waiting months for a custom developed site, a Clover website is available the same day as purchase.
  • Easy to Use
    The content management system is one of the easiest to use (if not the easiest) I’ve seen.
  • Robust Features
    You can have online calendars, sermons, videos, and more.
  • Search Engine Optimized (SEO)
    Despite being Flash websites, they are optimized for search engines.
  • Beautiful Aesthetics
    As you can see below, the websites look good.

THE CONS

  • So Easy It Is Dangerous
    Clover’s content management system is so easy to use that it risks empowering aesthetically-challenged users to turn a beautiful premade site into an ugly site through poor color choices and media uploads. However, in fairness all content management systems risk to some extent empowering people who should not design.
  • Flash-Based
    I am not a fan of all Flash websites, primarily because of visitor inconveniences such as the inability to copy and paste useful info like a church address or event details. But Flash does look cool.

    *UPDATE* - Clover informed me that their sites actually do provide for the ability for visitors to copy and paste content.
  • Premade vs 100% CustomĀ  Tailored
    Theoretically, a 100% custom tailored website is better than a premade site. Ideally, a church website will be custom designed by a very talented designer that understands how to create desired responses and communicate the church’s unique DNA through the smallest online details. However, this is very, very expensive and difficult. And sometimes the beauty of a premade design can do a better job communicating your brand than the custom design of a designer still learning the ropes.

Clover Church Website

Clover Church Website

Clover Church Website

Clover Church Website

Visit CloverSites.com to see a video of their content management system and actually demo it yourself.

Comments

There are 10 comments for this post.

  1. Mark Burleson on August 5, 2009 11:17 am

    Flash is also not able to be seen on the iPhone and with mobile browsing become more and more prevalent on usage they will be losing a large constituent base.

  2. Mickey on August 5, 2009 2:44 pm

    Another big downside to flash is Search Engine Optimization. Even the best-optimized Flash sites are pitiful compared to almost any text-based sites. For churches, this is HUGE.

    Beyond that, though, Clover does a great job.

  3. adam lehman on August 5, 2009 7:10 pm

    Our church uses clover.

    http://www.sawmillcovenantchurch.org

    I like it and being able to have a decent looking site and be totally in control of content is a huge plus. A church of our size (250) wouldn’t normally be able to work such an impressive site except for Clover.

  4. Kent Shaffer on August 5, 2009 7:44 pm

    @Adam

    Thanks for sharing your church website as a Clover example.

  5. Emi Carmichael on August 6, 2009 5:46 am

    Clover looks like a phenomenal option! There’s a similar product that doesn’t use Flash called CreationCentre if people are looking for alternatives - the pricing is identical, too…

    Clover is going in ‘the vault’ for later use - it’s awesome!

  6. Steve on August 9, 2009 11:31 pm

    Want an amazing website for $0??? We considered clover but flash is not the way to go… too many issues. We needed something that would allow for insite blogs. We built our site on squarespace… fully css, fully rss feed, and no upfront cost and as cheap as $8 a month!.

    I don’t work for squarespace, but man, that’s the way to go!!!

  7. Jason on August 10, 2009 8:53 pm

    I set up a friend or two on Clover. There are some definite cons:

    You can’t increase font size
    You can’t change colors of fonts
    you can’t change the font
    images cannot be placed in the page at all
    the templates have lack of flexibility

    nice for a startup church… not much else imho.

  8. Website Design Kent on August 14, 2009 4:28 pm

    Flash but SEO optimised. Sounds ideal combination.

  9. Ron on September 4, 2009 12:24 pm

    For a small church I think the setup costs are pretty high. The templates they offer also don’t seem to have a lot of flexibility and don’t offer much room for content.. at least from what I’ve seen.

  10. John on August 3, 2010 3:18 pm

    Our church uses Clover as well. Excellent product and a wonderful company! http://www.gracechurchlc.com

    A couple notes on Clover being flash-based. Clover saves a copy of every website in text format, meaning they have no problems with search engines. This also gives them the means to make excellent mobile sites with no problems - even in the iphone.

    Of course, Clover has just come out with their new Greenhouse editor, which solves most of the other problems listed above.

    While the templates can be a little “inflexible”, I think what Clover does does for church websites is awesome; namely, they force you to be simple.

Write a Comment